"MARKET QUALITY" CONCEPT WITH MARKET INTERNALS
top of page

#073: "MARKET QUALITY" CONCEPT WITH MARKET INTERNALS


In today’s article, I would like to share with you a concept that I have presented to students of our Trading Market Internals course. It’s a pretty simple, yet powerful concept on how Market Internals can be used:

  1. Take an existing Market Internals, let’s say NYSE TICK.

  2. Use NYSE TICK to define market “quality” zones: non-trending, trending, and strongly-trending.

  3. By doing this, we have created 3 different zones of quality for this given market, which I will call “Market Quality” (MQ).

  4. For each MQ zone, we can either set up different risk exposure/numbers of contracts or even switch between different trading strategies.

Let’s take a look at an example:

If we use NYSE TICK (this MQ concept can be applied to all other Market Internals, anyway), then the first step is to specify the zones as non-trending, trending, and strongly-trending.

According to my experience, the limit when a non-trending market changes to a trending one is at 300 to 400 for a long position, and -300 to -400 for a short position. Then, we need to set up the limit in which trending goes to strongly-trending, which is, based on my experience, somewhere at about +1,000/-1,000.

The definition of these 3 different MQ zones, when using TICK NYSE, looks like this:

Now, when we have defined the different zones for market quality (MQ), we need to ask ourselves, what do we do with this information? And there are two viable options.

The first one is risk management, or changing the number of contracts.

You simply test the number of contracts (1-3 or 0-2) for each zone and see how your system behaves when you use a different number of contracts, according to the MQ zone you are in. In this same way you can work, not only with the number of contracts, but also with your stop-loss. It is clear that each zone represents a different volatility and, therefore, using different stop-loss levels for each MQ zone can bring interesting results.

This is one of the basic applications of the MQ concept (it can be further developed into a more sophisticated form).

The second option is using MQ zones to switch the systems - something like this:

For non-trending market conditions, you will simply use a scalping system that doesn’t need big moves for profits. As soon as the Market Quality changes to a trending market, you will switch to trend-following strategies (for example a breakout strategy). And, as soon as the market reaches a certain level, when the trend might be reaching its end (when NYSE TICK gets above +1000/ below -1000), you should start looking for some counter-trend entries (mean-reversion) strategies, that are waiting for a counter-trend correction after a significant market move (and you try to make some profit from this correction).

Using this approach, you will get one “universal” system that will change its settings according to the Market Quality. This is just a theoretical example - the practical application is up to you. And it is quite a load of work to get from theory to practice. So, let’s get to it!

You can also work further on this concept, develop it to more forms and find other ways to use it - the example with TICK is just one of many ways in which Market Quality can be used. Or, you can use a “hybrid” of both these approaches - according to the MQ zone you can switch strategies, change your stop-loss, or maybe alter the number of contracts.

What I would do is keep the number of MQ zones low. 2-3 zones are absolutely enough - in the case of more zones, there is the risk that you could not have a sufficient number of trades in each sample.

Anyway, now you have a strong and interesting concept, so roll up your sleeves and get to work! :-)

You can learn more about Market Internals here.

Happy Trading!

Tomas

Get Social With Tom
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
What others are saying

"Tomas is one of the most creative traders I know. He is able to generate unique trading ideas and elegant solutions to system development challenges."

​

Andrew Swanscott, BetterSystemTrader.com

"Tomas has been a professional trader for more than a decade and I have had the privilege of monitoring his accounts in action since 2006. His systems are performing as some of the best I have ever monitored and executed. I have been in the trading industry since 2002 and worked with many developers from all over the world. Tomas is definitely the one to consider."

​

Martin Lembak,

Systems Trading Expert,

MFRM, CAIA 

"Tomas is a professional trader, who for the last 10 years has specialized in developing trading systems. We have been tracking his trading systems for about 5 years and they generally show very robust, stable and above average performance. Striker is pleased to work with someone like him - a real professional with enthusiasm and deep knowledge of trading."

​

William Galwas, President Of Striker Securities, Inc 

"Personal consultation with Tom helped me to re-evaluate the complexity of my robustness testing and optimization processes. Plus, it has helped me with a specific plan on how to take things forward. It has given me some great ideas on how to avoid overfitting and make my testing more robust and provided tips on low hanging fruit in terms of the best markets to trade for intraday/short-term breakouts."

​

Craig Peters,

semi-advanced trader,

United Kingdom 

"Tom's approach to Automated Trading Strategies design, tests of robustness and portfolio diversification is really unique. He has been a professional trader for many years and the depth of his understanding of Breakout strategies and Market Internals is hard to find elsewhere."

​

Antonin Fisher,

Hedge Fund Manager,

Czech Republic 

"Tom´s systems and trading approach do really work and can bring good, stable and reasonable returns. I can highly recommend him as a teacher."

​

David Hruby,

Trader, Czech Republic 

Author: Tom Nesnidal (more about me) 
bottom of page