#074: MY STUDENT'S STRATEGIES (CASE STUDY #29)

OUR NEW PLACE

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. Let your users get to know you.

#074: MY STUDENT'S STRATEGIES (CASE STUDY #29)

One of the disadvantages of automated trading, when compared to discretionary trading, is that you need to often use a stop-loss that is too large. It is not exceptional when it gets over $1,000 and some of the systems I have presented earlier have stop-losses even bigger than $2,000. I explained why you should avoid stop-losses that are too small in this article. But even with automated strategies you can find a strategy with a stop-loss that is quite reasonable. Usually, you will find these when building a strategy for e-mini index markets like E-mini Russell 2000, E-mini S&P MidCap 400, and others (as I explain in this course). But also other markets have a lot to offer - like the soybeans market.

 

The system that I would like to present you today, is for the soybeans market, it is short-biased, and the 7-year profit is $38,625 and the stop-loss is just $550. The close-to-close drawdown is just $2,512.50. Those are really nice numbers and it is a great system to start with.

 

Let's take a look at the setup:

 

  • Market:                                                Soybeans (S)

  • Main time frame (data1):                60-minute

  • Secondary time frame (data2):       Daily

  • Time template:                                  9:30am - 1:15pm

  • Profit factor:                                       1.94

  • Win %:                                                 55.86%

  • Avg.trade:                                            119.21 USD

  • Exit:                                                      stop-loss or at 1:15pm exchange                                                                    time (avg. winning trade                                                                                +440.26 USD)

  • Stop-loss:                                            550 USD(avg. losing trade                                                                                -293.30 USD)

 

A lower stop-loss usually means higher percentage of losing trades (as the stop-loss is hit more often), but this is not the case - almost 56% of trades are profitable. Also, the 1.94 profit factor is quite high. So the strategy does not rely on several “lucky” trades that would make all the profit, but it is distributed evenly throughout the years:

 

 

The equity curve covers the period from 2009 to 2015; it is composed of 10 out-of-sample periods (from about trade #80), the biggest drawdown ($2,500) is at about trade #130 and from that moment on there is just a rising equity with some flat periods.

 

As mentioned earlier - all trades are evenly distributed throughout the 7-year period. Each year it makes 40 to 60 trades, each year is profitable, and the annual net profits are relatively stable.

 

 

The net profit is $38,625 over 7 years, which makes an average annual profit of slightly over $5,500. And with the close-to-close drawdown of $2,500, the annual profit-to-drawdown ratio is almost 2.2.

 

The 1.94 profit factor is also really nice and so is the $119 average trade and almost 56% profitability - especially when considering the $550 stop-loss.

 

More numbers are in the table below:

 

 

Part of my robustness testing is the performance of a strategy in other markets. This strategy is, however, working only on the soybean market (30- and 60-minute timeframe) and it doesn't really perform well in other markets.

 

Overall, this strategy is really great to start with, as you only need a small account to trade it and you don’t need to worry too much about the drawdowns. Also, since it is easier to build a long-biased strategy, it is good to have it in a portfolio for bigger diversification. And it isn’t too complicated - as it uses just 3 conditions and 10 lines of Easylanguage code. You don't need to overcomplicate things to build robust profitable strategies.

 

Click here to learn more about the workflow I teach and start creating similar systems by yourself today.

 

Happy trading!

 

Tomas

 

Click here to read more success stories.

 

 

 

Please reload

Author: Tom Nesnidal (more about me
Join 15 000+
LinkedIn Followers
Join 5 000+
Twitter Followers
Get Social With Tom
  • Black LinkedIn Icon
  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon
  • Black RSS Icon
What others are saying

"Tomas is one of the most creative traders I know. He is able to generate unique trading ideas and elegant solutions to system development challenges."

Andrew Swanscott, BetterSystemTrader.com

"Tomas has been a professional trader for more than a decade and I have had the privilege of monitoring his accounts in action since 2006. His systems are performing as some of the best I have ever monitored and executed. I have been in the trading industry since 2002 and worked with many developers from all over the world. Tomas is definitely the one to consider."

Martin Lembak,

Systems Trading Expert,

MFRM, CAIA 

"Tomas is a professional trader, who for the last 10 years has specialized in developing trading systems. We have been tracking his trading systems for about 5 years and they generally show very robust, stable and above average performance. Striker is pleased to work with someone like him - a real professional with enthusiasm and deep knowledge of trading."

William Galwas, President Of Striker Securities, Inc 

"Personal consultation with Tom helped me to re-evaluate the complexity of my robustness testing and optimization processes. Plus, it has helped me with a specific plan on how to take things forward. It has given me some great ideas on how to avoid overfitting and make my testing more robust and provided tips on low hanging fruit in terms of the best markets to trade for intraday/short-term breakouts."

Craig Peters,

semi-advanced trader,

United Kingdom 

"Tom's approach to Automated Trading Strategies design, tests of robustness and portfolio diversification is really unique. He has been a professional trader for many years and the depth of his understanding of Breakout strategies and Market Internals is hard to find elsewhere."

Antonin Fisher,

Hedge Fund Manager,

Czech Republic 

"Tom´s systems and trading approach do really work and can bring good, stable and reasonable returns. I can highly recommend him as a teacher."

David Hruby,

Trader, Czech Republic 

"Tomas is truly an inspiring mentor and great trader with a positive life attitude. He has got very deep understanding of markets, breakout strategies, robustness testing procedures, and Market Internals."

Jan Lesanovsky,

Client, United Kingdom 

"As an experienced trader, I used Tomas´s consultation to get more clarity on best-practise robustness testing procedures, risk management, and portfolio management. He was quickly able to help me refine my current trading and system development approaches, and pointed me to really practical measures that I could implement immediately. I found Tomas to be not only extremely knowledgeable but very helpful and a great teacher. This has given me more confidence in developing robust strategies that work, and I would recommend his mentoring as extremely valuable for any systems trader."

Trevor West,

advanced trader, Australia 

The author of this trading blog has been featured on:

Download FREE resources to boost your trading
SOTR images-05-Emini min.png
SOTR images-06-STU min.png
SOTR images-08-TMI.png
SOTR images-07-SFB min.png
SOTR images-02 v4.png
SOTR images-09-v3.png
SOTR images-03-MSA min.png
SOTR images-01-v3.png
SOTR images-10-Checklist.png
SOTR images-04-Adaptrade builder min.png
Automated trading strategies that work!

© 2015-2018 SystemsOnTheRoad.com. All Rights Reserved  | Contact | About Me | Privacy Policy

  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon

DISCLAIMER:  Futures trading systems and commodity trading bear a high degree of risk. People can and do lose money.
Hypothetical results have many inherent limitations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. 

 

ACTUAL RESULTS SHOULD BE VIEWED WITH CAUTION, BECAUSE PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.