#084: MY STUDENT'S STRATEGIES (CASE STUDY #34)
Download FREE resources to boost your trading
SOTR images-05-Emini min.png
SOTR images-06-STU min.png
SOTR images-08-TMI.png
SOTR images-07-SFB min.png
SOTR images-02 v4.png
SOTR images-09-v3.png
SOTR images-03-MSA min.png
SOTR images-01-v3.png
SOTR images-10-Checklist.png
SOTR images-04-Adaptrade builder min.png
Automated trading strategies that work!

© 2015-2018 SystemsOnTheRoad.com. All Rights Reserved  | Contact | About Me | Privacy Policy

  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon

DISCLAIMER:  Futures trading systems and commodity trading bear a high degree of risk. People can and do lose money.
Hypothetical results have many inherent limitations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. 

 

ACTUAL RESULTS SHOULD BE VIEWED WITH CAUTION, BECAUSE PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

OUR NEW PLACE

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. Let your users get to know you.

#084: MY STUDENT'S STRATEGIES (CASE STUDY #34)

Most of the strategies in this series are for E-mini markets, as it is easiest to find a robust strategy on these markets. Energies can be also interesting for breakout strategies, but even for softs, like coffee, you can also find some interesting breakout strategies for your portfolio.

 

What might help you to find the strategies faster is to change your approach and look for swing strategies instead of intraday ones. Just replace the “end of day” exit with another one, like an ATR-based exit and see if that brings you better results.

 

Most traders avoid swing strategies because they are afraid of drawdowns. And sometimes they are bigger in swing strategies, but that’s not always the case. Like with this swing strategy for the coffee market that has a close to close drawdown of just $3,431, which is less than some of the intraday strategies for e-mini markets.

 

Let’s take a look at the setup:

 

  • Market:                                                 Coffee (KC)

  • Main time frame (data1):                  30-minute

  • Secondary time frame (data2):         180-minute

  • Time template:                                    8:00am - 2:00pm

  • Profit factor:                                         1.80

  • Win %:                                                   38.45%

  • Avg.trade:                                              103.91 USD

  • Exit:                                                        stop-loss or ATR-based Profit                                                                           Target (avg. winning trade                                                                           +607.55 USD)

  • Stop-loss:                                               ATR-based (avg. losing trade                                                                           -210.72 USD)

 

What you can notice from the table is the percentage of winning trades. Most strategies have about 60%, but this one has less than 40%; just 38.45% to be exact. That is roughly 4 profitable trades out of 10. What you need in such case is to have an avg. profitable trade that is big enough to cover all losses, plus generate some profit, which, in this case, it is. The avg. profitable trade is $607,55 and the avg. losing trade is $210.72. The ratio is 2.88, which is more than enough to cover the losses.

 

How do these statistics work in the long term? In 10 years, the strategy has generated $77,831 in profit. As you already know, the drawdown is $3,431, which gives us an annual net profit to drawdown ratio of 2.27. Not so bad when over 60% of trades are losing.

 

Let’s check if the equity curve looks as good as the numbers:

 

 

The equity curve doesn’t look that bad, either. There are some periods with drawdowns, like between trades #190 and #310, but in general we can see a nice and rising equity curve with not too many flat periods. This period can be quite long for some traders, considering the average number of trades 75 per year, that can be 1,5 years, but the strategy still makes new equity highs in this period. And when it starts rising again, it makes over $15,000 profit in 50 trades. Besides this part, the equity curve looks really good. Especially the most recent part, which is also a good sign.

 

Let’s take a look at the rest of the numbers:

 

 

Most of the numbers were already mentioned - the strategy has done, in 10 years, a $77,831 profit in 749 trades, 38.45% trades were profitable, maximum close to close drawdown is $3,431.25.

 

Usually in this part we also check the performance on other markets. In the case of coffee, there aren’t any similar markets we can test it on, but we can always try with other timeframes. When you change the primary timeframe to 5-, 15-, or 60-minute, it is still profitable. And when you change the 2nd timeframe from 180-minute to daily, it works even better; the profit factor goes to 1.85. So this is also good indication of how the system might perform in the future.

 

As you can see, you don’t need to avoid the coffee market, it is possible to find a nice strategy for this market as well. And if you don’t have much luck with traditional, end-of-day approach, just change and try swing strategies instead. You’ll see that not all of them have big drawdowns.

 

You can learn how to build similar strategies here.

 

Happy Trading!

 

Tomas

 

Click here to read more success stories.

 

 

 

Please reload

Author: Tom Nesnidal (more about me
Join 15 000+
LinkedIn Followers
Join 5 000+
Twitter Followers
Get Social With Tom
  • Black LinkedIn Icon
  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon
  • Black RSS Icon
What others are saying

"Tomas is one of the most creative traders I know. He is able to generate unique trading ideas and elegant solutions to system development challenges."

Andrew Swanscott, BetterSystemTrader.com

"Tomas has been a professional trader for more than a decade and I have had the privilege of monitoring his accounts in action since 2006. His systems are performing as some of the best I have ever monitored and executed. I have been in the trading industry since 2002 and worked with many developers from all over the world. Tomas is definitely the one to consider."

Martin Lembak,

Systems Trading Expert,

MFRM, CAIA 

"Tomas is a professional trader, who for the last 10 years has specialized in developing trading systems. We have been tracking his trading systems for about 5 years and they generally show very robust, stable and above average performance. Striker is pleased to work with someone like him - a real professional with enthusiasm and deep knowledge of trading."

William Galwas, President Of Striker Securities, Inc 

"Personal consultation with Tom helped me to re-evaluate the complexity of my robustness testing and optimization processes. Plus, it has helped me with a specific plan on how to take things forward. It has given me some great ideas on how to avoid overfitting and make my testing more robust and provided tips on low hanging fruit in terms of the best markets to trade for intraday/short-term breakouts."

Craig Peters,

semi-advanced trader,

United Kingdom 

"Tom's approach to Automated Trading Strategies design, tests of robustness and portfolio diversification is really unique. He has been a professional trader for many years and the depth of his understanding of Breakout strategies and Market Internals is hard to find elsewhere."

Antonin Fisher,

Hedge Fund Manager,

Czech Republic 

"Tom´s systems and trading approach do really work and can bring good, stable and reasonable returns. I can highly recommend him as a teacher."

David Hruby,

Trader, Czech Republic 

"Tomas is truly an inspiring mentor and great trader with a positive life attitude. He has got very deep understanding of markets, breakout strategies, robustness testing procedures, and Market Internals."

Jan Lesanovsky,

Client, United Kingdom 

"As an experienced trader, I used Tomas´s consultation to get more clarity on best-practise robustness testing procedures, risk management, and portfolio management. He was quickly able to help me refine my current trading and system development approaches, and pointed me to really practical measures that I could implement immediately. I found Tomas to be not only extremely knowledgeable but very helpful and a great teacher. This has given me more confidence in developing robust strategies that work, and I would recommend his mentoring as extremely valuable for any systems trader."

Trevor West,

advanced trader, Australia 

The author of this trading blog has been featured on: