#090: MY STUDENT'S STRATEGIES (CASE STUDY #37)
Download FREE resources to boost your trading
SOTR images-05-Emini min.png
SOTR images-06-STU min.png
SOTR images-08-TMI.png
SOTR images-07-SFB min.png
SOTR images-02 v4.png
SOTR images-09-v3.png
SOTR images-03-MSA min.png
SOTR images-01-v3.png
SOTR images-10-Checklist.png
SOTR images-04-Adaptrade builder min.png
Automated trading strategies that work!

© 2015-2018 SystemsOnTheRoad.com. All Rights Reserved  | Contact | About Me | Privacy Policy

  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon

DISCLAIMER:  Futures trading systems and commodity trading bear a high degree of risk. People can and do lose money.
Hypothetical results have many inherent limitations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. 

 

ACTUAL RESULTS SHOULD BE VIEWED WITH CAUTION, BECAUSE PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

OUR NEW PLACE

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. Let your users get to know you.

#090: MY STUDENT'S STRATEGIES (CASE STUDY #37)

When you’re developing a new strategy, in some markets, like Russell 2000, it is quite simple to find one. Especially when you’re building a long-biased strategy. But, just as well, there are some other markets that are not so easy to find a strategy for. One of them is sugar. You can spend weeks trying to find a robust strategy for such a market without any luck. But I have a couple of students that managed to do precisely that. This is why I haven’t presented you with too many strategies for the sugar market before (this is actually probably the first one).

 

A good way to start building an automated trading strategy is to take knowledge from discrete trading and apply it when developing an automated strategy. That’s exactly what one of my students did and added his favorite conditions for the sugar market to the Smart Code from the Breakout Strategies Masterclass.

 

But let’s take a look at the basic settings now:

 

  • Market:                                              Sugar (S)

  • Main time frame (data1):               15-minute

  • Secondary time frame (data2):      N/A

  • Time template:                                 8:00am - 2:30pm

  • Profit factor:                                      1.56

  • Win %:                                                19.35%

  • Avg.trade:                                           161.87 USD

  • Exit:                                                     Stop-loss or Profit Target (avg.                                                                       winning trade +2,335.84 USD)

  • Stop-loss:                                            Variable, biggest $1,467.20 USD                                                                       (avg. losing trade -359.89 USD)

 

What you can notice in the overview above is that under 20% of all trades of the strategy are profitable. That is quite low. Out of 5 positions, 4 of them will lose. In the past 8 years, the strategies had just 2 maximum consecutive winning trades. And up to 18 consecutive losses. With 40 trades per year on average, that is roughly 6 months. In these times you really need to have faith in the strategy and be sure you have done all the robustness-testing thoroughly. But on the other side, this strategy has a RRR (risk-reward-ratio) of 6.5 (the avg. profit is 6.5 times higher than the avg. loss), which is probably the highest we’ve had in this series.

 

The strategy has done, in less than 8 years, over $50,000 profit, that is over $6,200 average. And since the close to close drawdown is $6,082, the average net profit to max drawdown is slightly above 1:1. The ratio of long and short trades is almost equal (153/157), the percentage of winning trades is also similar (20.26% / 18.47%), but the average net profit is slightly higher in long trades. And so is the profit factor and overall net profit.

 

Let’s take a glance at how these numbers look on a chart:

 

 

As you can see, the characteristics of the equity curve match the percentage of the winning trades - there are some big wins (up to $2,834.80 per contract) usually followed by a lot of smaller losses. The accumulated losses before another big win usually reach between $1,000 and $2,000, but there are also some that reach $5,000 (or more). Like in the beginning, at about trade number 50, then again after trade number 200, and then again right before the close, at trade number 300. So these losses are nothing uncommon, they are something you need to get prepared for.

 

Let’s take a look at the numbers more in detail:

 

 

As I already mentioned, the long trades generate a slight bit more of profits than the short side ($27,287 to $22,890), the average trader net profit is about $35 more for long trades, but besides that, the characteristics of long and short trades are similar.

 

This is usually the part in which the strategy is tested on other markets as well, but since the sugar market is so specific, this strategy wasn’t tested on other markets.

 

But, as you can see, even with the less than 20% of winning trades, you can still have a profitable system that can generate nice profits and can be an interesting system for your portfolio (as the correlation to other systems in your portfolio will probably be close to 0), but you have to know that there can be up to 18 consecutive losses, and probably get ready for even more when you do the Monte Carlo Analysis.

 

Click here to learn how to build similar strategies.

 

Happy Trading!

 

Tomas

 

Click here to read more success stories.

 

 

 

Please reload

Author: Tom Nesnidal (more about me
Join 15 000+
LinkedIn Followers
Join 5 000+
Twitter Followers
Get Social With Tom
  • Black LinkedIn Icon
  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon
  • Black RSS Icon
What others are saying

"Tomas is one of the most creative traders I know. He is able to generate unique trading ideas and elegant solutions to system development challenges."

Andrew Swanscott, BetterSystemTrader.com

"Tomas has been a professional trader for more than a decade and I have had the privilege of monitoring his accounts in action since 2006. His systems are performing as some of the best I have ever monitored and executed. I have been in the trading industry since 2002 and worked with many developers from all over the world. Tomas is definitely the one to consider."

Martin Lembak,

Systems Trading Expert,

MFRM, CAIA 

"Tomas is a professional trader, who for the last 10 years has specialized in developing trading systems. We have been tracking his trading systems for about 5 years and they generally show very robust, stable and above average performance. Striker is pleased to work with someone like him - a real professional with enthusiasm and deep knowledge of trading."

William Galwas, President Of Striker Securities, Inc 

"Personal consultation with Tom helped me to re-evaluate the complexity of my robustness testing and optimization processes. Plus, it has helped me with a specific plan on how to take things forward. It has given me some great ideas on how to avoid overfitting and make my testing more robust and provided tips on low hanging fruit in terms of the best markets to trade for intraday/short-term breakouts."

Craig Peters,

semi-advanced trader,

United Kingdom 

"Tom's approach to Automated Trading Strategies design, tests of robustness and portfolio diversification is really unique. He has been a professional trader for many years and the depth of his understanding of Breakout strategies and Market Internals is hard to find elsewhere."

Antonin Fisher,

Hedge Fund Manager,

Czech Republic 

"Tom´s systems and trading approach do really work and can bring good, stable and reasonable returns. I can highly recommend him as a teacher."

David Hruby,

Trader, Czech Republic 

"Tomas is truly an inspiring mentor and great trader with a positive life attitude. He has got very deep understanding of markets, breakout strategies, robustness testing procedures, and Market Internals."

Jan Lesanovsky,

Client, United Kingdom 

"As an experienced trader, I used Tomas´s consultation to get more clarity on best-practise robustness testing procedures, risk management, and portfolio management. He was quickly able to help me refine my current trading and system development approaches, and pointed me to really practical measures that I could implement immediately. I found Tomas to be not only extremely knowledgeable but very helpful and a great teacher. This has given me more confidence in developing robust strategies that work, and I would recommend his mentoring as extremely valuable for any systems trader."

Trevor West,

advanced trader, Australia 

The author of this trading blog has been featured on: